"Earth as a Simulation Series I: How the New Age movements spiritual sayings are 'correct' for a COPIED population where everyone is 'accurately' living SOMEONE ELSE's LIFE. How 'Confirmation Bias & Cognitive Dissonance' are the deducible 'Fixed Behaviours' a copied population will present BUT, wont figure out because 'software' defined people can easily be managed."
Main Page Headings List
STUPIDLY EASY . .
When I say that we can easily, EASILY be managed if we are in a software defined reality then this is a complete and utter UNDERSTATEMENT.
If we are in a simulation then you, me and everyone else here are nothing but software and data storage. We would each be 100% utterly dependent on software for every single aspect of ourselves.
Perhaps you are thinking in this moment now that all of this is ridiculous?
In which case I’d have to ask you:
“Are these specific ‘ridiculous’ thoughts and reactions authentically spontaneously ‘yours’ OR have these thoughts and reactions been ‘spontaneously’ rendered within yourself because they serve the best interests of some simulation designer & the simulation projects objectives?”
Perhaps you are thinking in this moment now that all of this is horrifying?
In which case I’d have to ask you:
“Are these specific ‘horrifying’ thoughts and reactions authentically spontaneously ‘yours’ OR have these thoughts and reactions been ‘spontaneously’ rendered within yourself because they serve the best interests of some simulation designer & the simulation projects objectives?”
How could you start to become aware of which of your ‘thoughts, reactions and feelings’ are actually REALLY congruent to yourself and which are not?
I DO seriously appreciate that for some of you to even think about this will be very disturbing.
BUT, yet again, I’d have to ask you to question whether any ‘disturbing, worrying thoughts’ you do have are actually congruent to yourself OR is are these thoughts an example of the simulation attempting to divert you away from thinking about REALISTIC possibilities with respect to ‘earth as a simulation’ possibilities?
I’ve seen many people whom consider themselves completely rational and objective reduced to spouting gibberish when confronted with these types of possibilities while simultaneously they don’t seem to be aware that their responses are NOT rational and objective which is unfortunate as they are then not give the opportunity to be suspicious about their own behaviour.
What ‘Possibilities’ Would be Available to those Designing an Entirely Software Defined Population?
Again I’d have to point out that in a simulation where everything is defined by software it would be stupidly easy to have people observably present themselves in contradictory ways while NOT allowing them to become aware IN THE SLIGHTEST that they are BEING ENTIRELY CONTRADICTORY. In an entirely software defined simulation it would even be possible to have each person perceive events and interactions very, VERY differently to each other too.
What have YOU reading this noticed while you have read the last two pages?
For myself personally I start to get noticeable ‘put off’ effects happening on the previous page. My eye sight bizarrely starts to degrade and while reading this page it gets worse. It’s actually quite bad as I’m writing this line to describe these effects. Some specific paragraphs on this page I end up re-reading 2,3 or 4 times because I ‘feel’ as if what I’m reading I’m not taking in correctly (despite me being the one WRITING these lines).
Basically for certain lines on this page IT IS OBVIOUS that even for myself as the writer attempts are made to change the meaning and to jumble up the words while FADING away what I’m taking in, my understandings and ANY insights I get.
This of course would be impossible ‘IF’ we are in a real reality while if we are in a simulation that includes self aware and free thinking people then the designers would have to be seriously unbelievably stupid to not manage their simulated population COMPLETELY.
‘IF’ as a simulation designer you DID implement such personal management strategies to ensure that your population didn’t join stupidly simple dots then what STRUCTURAL ANOMALIES would these strategies ALSO HAVE YOUR POPULATION EXHIBITING?
Well, if they did implement effective strategies such that your population wasn’t allowed to THINK of stupidly obvious things such that they were completely incapable of being able to join stupidly simple dots then this AMAZINGLY would ALSO BE EVIDENCE that they were in a simulation because only in a simulation where every thought you have in your imagined to be ‘real’ head is generated by software it would be STUPIDLY EASY TO MANAGE . . .
EVERY SINGLE THOUGHT & THINKING LINE YOU HAVE IS INITIATED, DEFINED & GENERATED BY SOFTWARE ‘IF’ WE ARE IN A SIMULATION . . .
Which is why on web sites that SPECIFICALLY discuss the simulation argument AND the possibility that we are simulated people in a simulation they:
- NEVER – Define in any detail what a simulation is (apparently either everyone already knows this, or it’s is written ‘somewhere’ but they use invisible writing OR this information is TOP SECRET)
- They NEVER – Define what a matrix is (apparently either everyone already knows this, or it’s is written ‘somewhere’ but they use invisible writing OR this information is TOP SECRET)
- They NEVER list the differences between a matrix and a simulation (apparently either everyone already knows this, or it’s is written ‘somewhere’ but they use invisible writing OR this information is TOP SECRET)
- They NEVER describe in detail what it would be like to be completely software defined AS A PERSON (as I’ve done on this page and many other pages here) because if anyone did do this they’d very likely realize that there would be marked differences in behaviour and response of someone living in a simulation project compared to someone living in one of those MYTHICAL real realities.
In other words ‘IF’ anyone DID DO THIS then they’d likely figure out that confirmation bias is EVIDENCE that we are in a simulation project . . . AND if they did this then . . .
IT WOULD BE A DISASTER FOR THE SIMULATION PROJECT
It would be a ‘disaster’ because if your simulated population figured this out this would VERY likely change their behaviours away from what is defined by their script which would mean your simulation project CANNOT maintain accuracy under these conditions.
What other information would be seriously useful ‘IF’ you wanted to have even a basic chance of ‘THINKING’ about realistic ‘earth as a simulation’ project possibilities which is ALSO completely missing?
Click the right >> link below for the next page in this series . .
Click the ‘definitions’ HEADER below to get access to definitions of Matrix & Simulation
October 21, 2014 @ 3:41 am
I’ve read a lot of your website content and have also done most of the exercises in your Self Healing Handbook. I have no active 6th senses like you so my ability to utilise your findings is probably limited at best. I have no way of checking whether a process has worked, especially when you consider that even you were unable to release Shirley from her Buddhist vow after many, many attempts. (Has there been a resolution to that yet? Do you think it was the real Buddha or an imposter?)
It all leaves me feeling a bit hopeless and now I don’t really know what to believe.
I appreciate all of the information you’re sharing and the expansion of my awareness, but what is the average person supposed to do? Should we no longer put our faith and trust in Divine assistance or our spiritual guidance? Can we not even trust ourselves if we are under the influence of implants and software programs? I’m just trying to figure out what to do with all this. It seems I either hang around here and make feeble (maybe even futile from the sounds of things) attempts to be free or I go back to my little hamster wheel, do my balances and realignments and struggle through yet another life! It doesn’t seem like much of a choice. Have I missed something? Many thanks.
October 21, 2014 @ 3:02 pm
Nothing on this series of pages requires ‘belief’ as I’m pointing out that we are in a simulation and giving evidence of this.
The Buddha I was dealing with was/is as ‘real’ as the real Buddha as you or I are real.
Part of the point of this current set of pages that SHOULD be sinking in because THIS IS THE FIRST TIME YOU WILL HAVE READ ANYTHING OF THESE POSSIBILITIES & IN THIS DETAIL is that if you are not even given the opportunity to become aware of ‘something’ you cannot even start to THINK about this ‘something’.
YOU now have the opportunity to THINK about what I’m writing here and perhaps you can figure out more than me as a start.
Ignorance is bliss / BUT deeper understandings can be hell BUT if you stay in a fantasy then the only thing you’ve got is a fantasy which might be comforting but it’s still a FANTASY and won’t change anything.
The next series after this one will take this further AND in doing this you start to get ideas for solutions to specific healing issues BECAUSE in understanding the TRUE nature of your reality to can start figuring out how to approach dealing with things based on how your reality actually works.
October 22, 2014 @ 4:48 am
Thanks Clive. I look forward to further instalments.
October 21, 2014 @ 11:52 pm
I broke down and cried and got really angry. As I was contemplating your material, I heard a clicking sound in my head like a clock or something very light. The confirmation bias. Son of a bitch, you were right. That was bugging me. I was wondering how human beings could be statistically measured like that. It was bugging me.
November 4, 2015 @ 11:05 pm
I admit that these pages have been a struggle to read and it hasn’t been the writing style. I have been able to understand and retain so far but must read a few times.
If I were the programmer and had been alerted that Clive had spilled the beans I would create what coders call a patch but you call an implant to block understanding of the material. I would locate all who have already read this and make it impossible to communicate these ideas to others. I would strongly influence Clive to take up another interest like crocheting tea cozies.
If this has not yet happened, does it mean this isn’t a simulation, or does it just mean this breach is being contained? Could it be a test? Have the programmers abandoned their post?
What is the purpose of this simulation?
November 4, 2015 @ 11:40 pm
Ahh Mary, you’re giving it ideas there . . . So far it’s not tried the ‘crocheting tea cozies’ approach . . . and fortunately there are no ‘patches’ it’s running on it’s own with no updates and no external ‘bad guys’ monitoring else I’d have been ‘got’ a decade or so back (way too complicated to explain why and if I tried I’d be buried in questions that would make a ‘crocheted tea cozy’ attack look appealing). I figured out most of it’s ‘main’ tactics 8/9/10 years ago and have adjusted my lifestyle accordingly . . . i.e. it’s been backed into a very limiting corner . . . so limiting it’s not even had the opportunity to deliver a ‘crocheted tea cozy’ attack!!! haha
The purpose of this simulation has been indirectly alluded to in comments, some coming ‘memory’ pages include some more alluded to possibilities. Basically imagine the most ‘horrifying’ possibilities and then multiply by exponentials then you’re getting close . . .
November 4, 2015 @ 11:34 pm
To answer the call for useful ideas, I would say that it would be useful to know the limits of the control. If every thought is controlled then Clive could not have had this idea and, moreover, there would be no reason to run the simulation (unless we are some galactic middle schooler’s science project).
November 4, 2015 @ 11:54 pm
Well Mary, it has to maintain the illusion that you can do and think what you want. So, it relies on stopping you from STARTING TO THINK down particular lines. I.e. it makes your bead blank, it prevents ‘new’ thinking possibilities from arising. So, if you decide to KEEP thinking down certain lines it can only distract/divert/occupy you away from those lines. Remember the ‘lifestyle changes’ I mentioned in the previous comment, well I keep thinking and thinking and thinking and WRITING out logical possibilities . . . you’ve probably about a 100 sim pages on soul-healer.com here I’ve 800 more on my computer (and in various backups . . . ) I’ve a vast network of ‘evidence’ 10 times what is presented here. The more you figure out the easier it is to figure out more.
AND before you ask the obvious question . . . the answer is that the more I present here the less people will be ALLOWED to come and read the pages. So, the ‘enhancement’ pages I’m specifically writing here because there are 10000’s of variations of physical implants and the ‘exercises’ (when people actually do them) are ‘monitored’ and are used to identify what implants you’ve got which are part of the ‘dastardly’ plan to understand ‘everything’ enough to throw big spanners in the works . . .
January 26, 2017 @ 11:58 am
Oh MY! I have read this a number of times…my mind feels completely garbled. I can’t even find the words to explain. Full body numbness, a sense of fear (even though I’m not actually afraid (I have this internal sensation of tremors (seems to be related to fear – as I say, even though I’m not afraid). The tremor it isn’t visible externally.)), feelings of anxiety (nausea, SOB) even though I’m not anxious, my head feels heavy, like its cloaked, or wading through treacle. I can’t “see” clearly, when I talk my words come out all mixed up. My face, neck, chest and upper arms feel cold/numb similar to pins and needles. Strange that the first time I read this (today, not the very first time) I could understand more, but then I read it again and completely lost the plot! None of it made sense, completely distracted at nearly every word. Will have to give it a break and come back later. Hectic!
January 30, 2017 @ 7:22 pm
Often the ‘shit’ will use some combination of 1a) have you read and remember the main points 1b) Have you read and ‘think’ you remember the main points only to result in 2) have you return and be unable to read and or when / if you actually DO make it back to read you’ll find it’s a different / entirely different article to what you read before . . .
3 to 5 times (in my terms) is the minimum you should read everything here before even attempting to ‘discuss’ or appraise your own reading – making notes helps too . . .