Modern Medicine, Quality of Research & Health Care Approaches, Practices & Recommendations & the Observable ‘Insane’ Outcomes!!!

What are the historical/environmental/evolutionary origins of humans?

Well, a few 1000’s of years ago the early humans were all forager/hunter omnivores (able to eat both herbage/plants as well as other animals).

As they’d PERMANENTLY (compared to ourselves) live in the ‘outdoors’ and they’d be walking around in the outdoors ALL THE TIME, PLUS they’d ALL, be an ‘expert’ in ‘food’ identification right from the age when they first started walking, then as they walked around, walked from place to place then rather than them constantly eating packets of crisps, sweets while drinking sugared water pretty much ALL THE TIME, they’d be ‘browsing’ and picking and eating ALL THE TIME any edible herbage, leaves, flowers, fruit, seed pods, seeds, plant stalks, bark as well as digging up and snacking on any edible roots and tubers too.

They’d also be expert (not on supermarket ‘offers’) but in all the ‘signs’ of potential food even twigs sticking out from under snow would perhaps signify a ‘tuber’ snack!!!

It’s also very likely that they’d not be ‘FUSSY’ either, in fact, it’s highly likely that they’d have identified and they’d eat 100’s of plant species regularly/constantly while less regularly they’d have some ‘meat’!!! Under most conditions they’d very ‘likely’ be a lot healthier than us!!! Tooth decay, tooth ache for example would likely be unheard of as would dentists (whom wouldn’t be needed anyway)!!!

How many flowers did you eat yesterday?

When was the last time you noticed a bag of fresh/mixed flowers in your local supermarkets ‘veg’ area? ‘Never’!!! Yea me neither!!!!

So, over the last few 1000 years we have VERY LIKELY had our diet reduced from ‘LITERALLY’ encompassing 100’s of edible plant species ‘parts’ (flowers, leaves, stalks, bark, roots, tubers, fruits etc) many of which over a year would be eaten regularly if not DAILY . . . ‘TO’ . . . WAIT FOR IT . . . a recommendation ‘WESTERN’ diet for decades of MEAT & TWO VEG!!!!

It’s not looking good for that ‘evolution’ idea is it or maybe it’s the limited/extremely poor nutritional diet we’re being recommended to eat/consume that’s perhaps partially or completely responsible for the POOR THINKING ABILITIES/POOR EVALUATIONS, leading to the current EPIDEMIC OF POOR DIET RECOMMENDATIONS!!!!

It’s very obvious that ‘something’ is SERIOUSLY ‘FLAWED’ in a fundamental sense with regards ‘recommendations’ relating to our diet!! Perhaps the same could be said (‘seriously flawed’) of those that are evaluating/assessing and then making dietary recommendations!!!

It is a ‘FACT’ that your diet/what you CONSISTENTLY EAT will ABSOLUTELY have a major impact on your health and well being and particularly over the long term. It is also a fact that eating a wide range of the likes of flowers, leaves, stalks, bark, roots, tubers, fruits etc PLUS ‘bits’ from the occasional ‘animal’ will pretty much AUTOMATICALLY result in the eater taking in sufficient carbohydrate and protein to sustain themselves. In other words THE LEAST IMPORTANT food components to emphasise would be carbohydrate and protein as these you’d get directly or indirectly via eating a WIDE VARIETY OF NATURAL FOOD STUFFS ANYWAY.

It is a ‘FACT’ that VITAMINS/MINERALS/’SPECIALIST’ ‘RARE’ human body requirement ‘ITEMS’ (with respect to OVERALL BODY FUNCTIONING) will be way more important with respect to making sure people eat enough of these in SUFFICIENT QUANTITIES compared to the TWO most commonly mentioned ITEMS that are found in most foods ANYWAY!!!

In other words, you’d ‘EXPECT’ that ‘people’ and particularly academics/scientists would emphasise the rarer requirements and say recommend people have access to and eat more things that are RICH IN THESE!!! Things like flowers, leaves, stalks, bark, roots, tubers, fruits etc . . . you would also ‘EXPECT’ that absolutely ALL doctors would be EXPERTS in diet and nutrition because these are ABSOLUTELY FUNDAMENTAL to our base ‘health’ STATE . . . however, even a cursory examination of these specific food/nutrition areas shows us that THE OPPOSITE IS IN FACT TRUE!!!

Let’s have a quick look at vitamins and minerals. I’ve been interested in and ‘following’ the vitamin and mineral FARCE for about 2/3 decades now . . . .

BUT, before I get round to these let me point out that I’ve a bookmark folder ‘X’ with about 200 sites that cover all sorts of topic areas from archeology, climate, health, science, ufo’s, history, etc. etc. I’m basically interested in an extremely wide range of topics and ALSO the ‘quality’ of information presented. I read some ‘status quo/science’ sites as well as many ‘alternate’ sites too. I spend an hour sometimes more having a look at/reading anything from these sites pretty much EVERY SINGLE DAY (in the morning) last thing at night, often after midnight I check read anything that catches my eye of both ‘popular as well as alternate’ news sites!!!

Basically, my scale of interests/knowledge is the exact opposite of POOR.

So, I started to notice some vitamins and minerals (V&M) studies bizarreness’s, over a decade ago. Basically, there were many extensive studies carried out comparing the outcomes of people taking and not taking V&M’s. These are presumably comparing the outcomes of people taking V&M compared to those that don’t take these (or whom are taking a placebo). The vast majority of these studies are ‘strangely’ making a big effort to point out that actually taking V&M’s make no difference or virtually no difference to outcomes/health.

I was personally very puzzled about these studies, because in that they consistently showed that regularly taking V&M’s made no difference to your health then this ‘directly’ implies that basically pretty much EVERYONE must be getting enough vitamins and minerals in their diet, such that giving them more is irrelevant. That’s pretty much the conclusion you’d have come to with respect to these studies isn’t it!!

However, based on the recommended meat&2veg nutrient poor diet then to myself, the results/conclusions of V&M studies pretty much DON’T MAKE ANY SENSE AT ALL!!!

Eventually, and it took years before I found this out (coincidentally from some of those ALTERNATE HEALTH SITES (you know the supposedly ‘fake’ information supplying ones)) I became aware that the VAST MAJORITY of what is labelled and sold as VITAMINS & MINERALS turn out to the equivalent of a placebo quite simply because VIRTUALLY ALL V&M multi supplements sold contain V&M’s that are NOT UTILIZABLE/DON’T FUNCTION AS A V/M IN HUMANS. It turns out that they are ‘industrial’ chemicals that coincidentally are in a form that the body CANNOT USE/UTILISE (i.e. they are in a NONE NATURAL FORM).

I’d like to take the opportunity to point out that ‘NONE NATURAL’ could very likely be ‘construed’ as being directly equivalent/equal to: ‘UNNATURAL/ARTIFICIAL/SYNTHETIC/MANUFACTURED’

In other words the vast majority of those V&M STUDIES are all of ‘FAKE/SHAM’ none vitamins & minerals that are completely useless because they are unusable to the human body. In other words the vast majority of vitamin studies are being done by academics whom OBVIOUSLY haven’t actually checked ‘EXACTLY’ what it is that they are using for these studies.

So, the vast majority of these types of studies are not evaluating the body’s response to being provided with extra vitamins and minerals, rather they are actually an indirect measure of the incompetence/ignorance of the academics and scientists carrying out these studies (and those that review / appraise these pseudo science/misleading research papers).

Years ago I found a few alternate health web sites that had actually identified the V&M products that used extracted V&M’s from plants (way more expensive compared to the USELESS industrial chemical versions) BUT, they WERE usable by the human body and the V&M comparison studies that used these plant extracted V&M products DID SHOW IMPROVEMENTS IN PHYSICAL BODY STATES/HEALTH OUTCOMES and in some cases VASTLY.

Just to make this very clear!!! We have a situation where for decades befuddled academics have used ‘off the shelf’ V&M products without checking if ‘chemically’ they ACTUALLY FUNCTION AS V&M IN HUMANS to then perform studies using these BUT, rather than actually be SUSPICIOUS about these V&M not making any difference (because they are essentially nothing more than INDUSTRIAL CHEMICALS being passed off as V&M’s) and then ACTUALLY STATE THIS, which would have resulted in a BIG OUTCRY/COMPANIES SELLING THESE WOULD BE ASKED TO WITHDRAW THESE PRODUCTS . . .


We are ‘NOW’ two decades later STILL in exactly the same ‘befuddled’ position, the majority of V&M products are still USELESS, BUT WORSE so are the scientists and academics researching these!!!!

Strangely, the vast majority of MSM ‘news’ reports of multi-V&M studies give a direct or indirect impression that we are getting all the V&M’s we need from what we are eating (which implies that our diets are ‘GOOD’) when in fact the studies these news items are based on, are of the studies that are not evaluating V&M’s that humans can utilise in the first place.

Let me give you some quotes from the above linked page:

“In the historic struggle for food, humans ate primarily whole foods or so-called natural foods, which underwent little processing. The nutrient content of food usually decreases when it is processed”.

“Intensive animal rearing, manipulation of crop production and food processing have altered the qualitative and quantitative balance of nutrients of food consumed by Western society. This change, to which the physiology and biochemistry of man may not be presently adapted to, is thought to be responsible for the chronic diseases that are rampant in the Industrialized Western Countries”

“A study involving 38,772 women in the USA who took synthetic multi-vitamins with ground up rock minerals found that the women died earlier than those who did not take them.”

How could this happen / be happening for a long time (decades now) and THESE CIRCUMSTANCES ARE NOT MADE ‘ABSOLUTELY’ CLEAR!!!

Did you know that your skin can and often does automatically absorb air-born contaminants, never mind that you are breathing ‘ANYTHING’ that is in the air around you into your extremely sensitive and highly absorbent lungs ALL THE TIME such that a lot of air contaminants can get pretty much direct access to your blood AND end up accumulating in all sorts of diverse places within your body.

So, anything ‘NOT NATURAL’ being released into the atmosphere you’d imagine ‘WOULD’ be thoroughly assessed for its direct as well as long term effects on human health?

Are you aware that there are recorded cases of people dying from using LYNX deodorant spray? What sort of evaluations/testing/assessments did they carry out on these deodorants before putting them on the market? Did they even do any ‘health’ assessments? Being a none idiot I don’t use ‘unnatural’ deodorants. It’s likely early humans didn’t use these AT ALL either!!!

A lot of people spend a lot of time in their car . . . so it’s ‘ODD’ that the interior ‘out gassing’ emissions which are now a common feature for new cars in many cases are identified as relating to chemicals that are associated with a wide range of heath problems?:

“A new study suggests that new car smell comes from toxic chemicals off-gassing in a car’s interior, like brominated flame retardants (BFRs), chromium, and lead. In all, researchers identified more than 275 different chemicals in vehicle interiors, including those associated with birth defects, impaired learning, liver problems, and cancer.”

New carpet health problems anyone? What about for new kitchen items? Can you see the ‘obvious’ problem here?

Well, why is it that no one automatically ‘THINKS’, Mmmmm as we are NOT now making cars/furniture/carpets etc. etc. with exclusively natural materials then ‘shouldn’t’ we ‘AUTOMATICALLY’ TEST ALL NEW: UNNATURAL/ARTIFICIAL/SYNTHETIC/MANUFACTURED PRODUCTS for potential health problems FIRST?

NOPE, the rational, objective, logical, ‘SENSIBLE/REASONED’ approaches just don’t happen do they?

I could do ‘exactly’ the same for water too and present item after item of the BALMY UNNATURAL/ARTIFICIAL/SYNTHETIC/MANUFACTURED shit that’s directly added to as well as the massive, STUPENDOUS ‘MULTITUDE’ of toxic/detrimental to humans UNNATURAL/ARTIFICIAL/SYNTHETIC/MANUFACTURED ‘SHIT’ that FINDS ITS OWN WAY into our drinking water supplies.

The ‘FLINT’ WATER FARCE in the USA for example is just the tip of a very, VERY LARGE ICEBERG!!!

Let me also point out that from an academic/science perspective we’ve a massive focus on ‘evolution’ which makes it very clear that ‘humans’ and all other living forms as well as all ‘natural’ systems have all gradually evolved/developed as well as ADAPTED over VERY LONG TIME SPANS to very gradual changes.

Let me also point out that this ‘evolution’ system has been systematically SHOWN to TAKE ‘AGES’ TO ADAPT to changes even to ‘natural’ circumstances involving INHERENTLY ‘NATURAL’ COMPONENTS THAT ARE A NATURAL PART OF THE ‘NATURAL ORDER/SYSTEM’ . . . in this ‘RESPECT’ . . . introducing 100,000’s of UNNATURAL/ARTIFICIAL/SYNTHETIC ‘SHIT’ which are not part of the NATURAL ORDER/SYSTEM i.e. ‘components’ that haven’t arisen NATURALLY/AS PART OF THE ‘NATURAL’ SYSTEM . . . but have been introduced WILLY/NILLY with no or virtually no testing and certainly ‘NONE’ over any time span that could be construed IN THE SLIGHTEST as being equivalent to ‘AGES’ . . .

Are you getting the picture here?

How, UNCONSCIOUS/DISASSOCIATED/INCOMPETENT/IN A FUGUE ‘STATE’ would you have to be to be PARTY TO the WHOLESALE INTRODUCTION of UNNATURAL/ARTIFICIAL/SYNTHETIC ‘SHIT’ over an evolutionary time span that could be summed up as:


While expending an amount of time/effort to check each UNNATURAL/ARTIFICIAL/SYNTHETIC ‘product’ for possible ‘toxicity/adverse health effects’ that could easily be summed up as F**K ALL/GROSSLY INADEQUATE verging on ‘NONE EXISTENT’!!!

Now, ‘all of the above’ has been setting the scene while providing background context for what I’ll be writing below.

I became a healing practitioner/therapist by leaving ‘academia’ specifically to pursue/broaden my understandings as well as to push my own boundaries!!! I had some ‘training’, and I had some ‘initiations’ into a couple of healing systems and I’d also worked regularly with a few people BUT, AS PER USUAL, in that I’m always pushing the edge/boundaries AND, if anything doesn’t add up (which to myself generally seems to be pretty much everything) then I’m consistently going more and more deeply into specific things and more and more so from a personal accessing the ‘SIMULATED’ subtle body/subtle environment directly.

In all it took me about a decade before A) I’m doing this proficiently (in my terms) and B) by this time those that I’ve been associating with/have become close to within these areas (the spiritual/new age ‘realms’) are giving me strange looks, are arguing with me, trying to persuade me that ‘whatever’ I’m saying ISN’T TRUE/IS BULLSHIT/I AM ‘CRAZY’. I literally had quite a few past friends consistently telling me I’m ‘crazy’ . . . and that I need to revert back to what I had been doing (the newage bullshit line) . . .

I ‘should’ point out that becoming aware of never mind deliberately orientating to and regularly accessing/engaging with the subtle ‘realm/strata/dimension’ isn’t appreciated by our entirely software defined reality. To do this well, it takes an extreme level of ‘ATTENTION/FOCUSED CONCENTRATION’ to ‘enter’ and to ‘keep’ your attention orientated to your subtle originated/focused perceptions/awareness’s which are of course originating within your subtle form. Doing this absolutely ‘isn’t’ equivalent to ‘meditation’ (for example).

However, at this point I’m finding myself getting shades of ‘deja vu’ as I’m being subjected to some of the same sort of reactions that I had from friends within science because I was ‘unbelievably’ involving myself in a whole range of ‘things’ that science hasn’t even started to get any handle on at all!!! Overall though, I left the university for the most part to PUSH MY OWN BOUNDARIES. At this point, in my life I have turned my debilitating stammer, speech block around massively and I’m now going to start to regularly talk to groups of people AND occasionally even give public talks as part of EFFORTS to keep pushing these as well as other boundaries of myself.

Diabetes . . .

In that my university department was focused on diabetes and a lot of my own (Hetherington CS) research contributions were related to these areas:

  1. Taylor R, Hetherington CS, Tolley S, Dodson G. Biological activity of despentapeptide insulin in human and rat adipocytes and hepatocytes. Diabetologia 1984; 27/2.
  2. Taylor R, Heaton A, Hetherington CS, Alberti KGMM. Effect of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis on invivo and invitro insulin sensitivity. Clinical Science 1985; 69, 12.
  3. Conlon JM, Hetherington CS, Alberti KGMM. Characterisation of the somatostatin-degrading activity of the cytosol and plasma-membrane fractions of rat liver. In: Kirschke H, Langner J, Wiederanders B, Bohley P eds. Proteinases in Mammalian Tissues and Cells Halle-Wittenburg: Kongress and Tag unsverichte der Martin Luther Universitat 1982: 159-161..
  4. Hetherington CS, Kier M, Stappenbeck R, Simm A, Brigham LL, Skillen AW, Hodson AW. Computer acquisition and analysis of data in enzymatic fluorimetric continuous flow methods for the measurement of glucose, lactate, pyruvate, alanine, glycerol and 3-hydroxybutyrate in human blood. Journal of automatic chemistry 1986; 8/2, 49-55.
  5. Taylor R, Heaton A, Hetherington CS, Alberti KGMM. Adipcyte insulin binding and insulin action in chronic renal failure before and during continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis. Metabolic clinical and experimental 1986; 35/5, 430-435.
  6. Taylor R. Hetherington CS, Gill GV, Alberti KGMM. Changes in tissue insulin sensitivity in previously brittle diabetics. Hormone and metabolic research 1986;18/7, 493.
  7. Hawthorn GC, Bartlett K, Hetherington CS, Alberti KGMM. Polyol pathway and myoinositol metabolism in endothelial cells acutely exposed to high glucose levels. Diabetologia 1988; 31,7.
  8. Walter JH, Thompson GN, Leonard JV, Hetherington CS, Bartlett K. Measurement of propionate turnover in vivo using sodium [2H5] propionate and sodium [13C] propionate. Clinica Chimica Acta 1989; 182, 141-150.
  9. Hawthorn GC, Bartlett K, Hetherington CS, Alberti KGMM. The effect of high glucose on polyol pathway activity and myoinositol metabolism in cultured human endothelial cells. Diabetologia 1989; 32, 163-166.
  10. Taylor R, Hetherington CS, Tolley S. Receptor binding and biological potency of despentapeptide insulin. Hormone and metabolic research 1989; 21, 249-252.
  11. Davis SN, Ansiferov M, Hetherington CS, Brown M, Branch WJ, Hales CN, Orskov H, Alberti KGMM. The effects of human proinsulin on glucose turnover and intermediary metabolism in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism 1992; 75/5, 1282-1288.
  12. Davis SN, Monti L, Piatti PM, Brown M, Hetherington CS, Orskov H, Sobey W, Hales CN, Alberti KGMM. Dose response characteristics of human proinsulin and insulin in non-insulin dependent diabetic humans. American Journal of physiology 1992; 263/1, 28-35.
  13. Davis SN, Monti L, Piatti PM, Ansiferov M, Hetherington CS, Brown M, Orskov H, Branch W, Hales CN, Alberti KGMM. Assessment of proinsulin’s effects on intermediary metabolism using the forearm technique in normal man. Diabetologia 1993; 30, 29-35.
  14. Davis SN; Piatti PM; Monti L; Brown M; Hetherington C; Antsiferov M; Sobey W; Hales CN; Orskov H; Alberti KG. (Feb 1993). The effects of subcutaneous human proinsulin on the production of 64/65 split proinsulin, glucose turnover and intermediary metabolism in non-insulin-dependent diabetic man. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 19:103-113
  15. Dyer RG; Hetherington CS; Alberti KG; Laker MF. (06 Jan 1995). Simultaneous measurement of phytosterols (campesterol and beta-sitosterol) and 7-ketocholesterol in human lipoproteins by capillary column gas chromatography. J Chromatogr B Biomed Appl. 663:1-7.
  16. Berrish TS; Hetherington CS; Alberti KG; Walker M. (Jun 1995). Peripheral and hepatic insulin sensitivity in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. Diabetologia. 38:699-704.
  17. Daley SE, Pearson ADJ, Craft AW, Kernahan J, Wyllie RA, Price L, Hetherington CS, Bartlet K. Whole body protein metabolism in children with cancer, (submitted).
  18. Reaich R, Graham KA, Channon SM, Hetherington CS, Scrimgeour CM, Wilkinson R, Goodship THJ. Correction ofacidosis in chronic renal failure improves insulin mediated glucose utilisation but not insulin mediated changes in protein degredation. (in Press).

Then, it wasn’t a surprise that in interacting with the ‘alternate therapists/practitioners/healers/new age’ crowd, that when they found out about my ‘weird’ background I’d find myself having occasional in depth discussions as to what the possible ‘REAL’ CAUSES of diabetes could be!!!!

I can remember in the early internet years doing a search to find out which ‘populations/sub populations’ had the greatest incidence of diabetes. At that time I found that African Americans had the highest % incidence for diabetes (i.e. these are people of a population whom had been kidnapped and made into slaves). In other words, they’d all be traumatized, they’d likely have been continually ‘disappointed’ by life, feel ‘let down’ and maybe even betrayed. I then found that the Native Americans had an even higher incidence of diabetes. So this is a population of many different tribes EACH OF WHICH have had every single treaty they have ever made broken (“white man speaks with forked tongue” – you must remember that!!!?).

In other words in plain sight you have two populations with the highest diabetes incidence both being subjected to the same types of long term on going traumas (Current diabetes web stats: 12.7% of African Americans / 15.1% of American Indians/Alaskan Natives).

So, two and a half decades ago I was vaguely ‘speculating’ that ‘diabetes’ was our SUBTLE BODIES (you know, the invisible body that’s lying on a slab/is in a pod ‘somewhere’!!!!) RESPONSE to being subjected to extremes of betrayal, repeated betrayal as well serious and likely repeated let downs and disappointments being translated/converted into ENTIRELY MADE UP ARBITRARY, BUT ‘CONSISTENT’ PHYSICAL SYMPTOMS for presentation within the easily observed physical body!!!

In this respect, if you reading this actually have a subtle body form that is being simulated as interfaced to the EASILY SEEN/OBSERVED HUMAN FORM then a valid question to ponder upon might be the following:

“How are the subtle bodies ailments, the subtle bodies health/illnesses/abnormal functioning TRANSLATED/EXPRESSED within the remote vehicle ‘human’ physical form?”

The following is a very brief summary/definition of the: insulin dependent, type 1 diabetes taken from wikipedia:

“Diabetes mellitus, commonly referred to as diabetes, is a group of metabolic disorders in which there are high blood sugar levels over a prolonged period. Type 1 diabetes results from the pancreas’s failure to produce enough insulin. This form was previously referred to as “insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus”. The cause is unknown.”

So, the pancreas ‘fails’ such that people have to TOP UP ‘INSULIN’ LEVELS with insulin injections!! I was amazed to read that the ‘ACTUAL’ CAUSE OF THIS HAPPENING IS ‘UNKNOWN’, because it’s likely that WORLD WIDE literally many billions of pounds are spent on diabetes as well as diabetes research BUT, ‘UNBELIEVABLY’ they STILL:


While working within the department I’d very, VERY ‘occasionally’ catch some of the senior researchers talking about SPONTANEOUS REMISSIONS of some diabetics.

Now, the interesting thing from my perspective was that discussions of ACTUAL spontaneous remissions actually provoked visible ‘SHOCK’ in those discussing these because ESSENTIALLY/QUITE LITERALLY they are IMPOSSIBLE!!!!

Diabetes type 1 has the pancreas shutting down, limiting the production of insulin which itself regulates/limits the production of glucose. Spontaneous remissions indicate that a COMPLETE REVERSAL OF THE SHUTDOWN OF THE PANCREAS can ‘magically’ happen over just a few days. From a physical body ‘ONLY’ perspective, this happening is absolutely impossible, hence the visible look of SHOCK I noticed because this ‘ACTUALLY’ happening can essentially only be described as HIGHLY ANOMALOUS/IMPOSSIBLE quite simply because it absolutely CANNOT BE EXPLAINED IN ‘PHYSICAL’ BODY ONLY TERMS.

At one point (when I was working as a healer therapist) I met up with a couple whom were both alternate therapists, and, while spending a few days with them the conversation eventually worked its way round to ‘diabetes’, at which point I mentioned my suspicions that diabetes is the ‘SUBTLE BODIES’ response to ‘BETRAYAL, & ‘SERIOUS’ LET DOWNS & DISAPPOINTMENTS‘, at which point one of my friends looks at me ‘SHOCKED’ and tells me that his brother had type 1 insulin dependent diabetes (he had to inject insulin) that SPONTANEOUSLY DISAPPEARED over a couple of days.

NOW, it turned out that he was SHOCKED, because his brother’s attitude towards his mother WHILE HE HAD THE DIABETES was way over the top, he was angry, reactive towards her. In other words, he was basically behaving as if his mother had in some way betrayed him, let him down and or seriously disappointed him. The ‘shock’ was because these reactions/attitudes towards his mother ‘DISAPPEARED’ with the type 1 diabetes spontaneous remission!!!

So, the cause of type 1 insulin dependent diabetes may be a mystery to Diabetologists, BUT it’s not to me!!!

So, my friend’s brother is very likely ‘simulating’ someone whom AS A SUBTLE BEING tried to identify (either they did this themselves or perhaps with a ‘SUBTLE’ therapist) what was responsible for their persistent let down, betrayal, ‘trauma’ originating reactions to either specific people/a group of people/some circumstance etc, that would have resulted in them being subjected to some form of ‘betrayal, serious let down and or disappointment’? In ‘properly’ dealing with how the subtle body had been ‘impacted/changed’ by the original circumstances then the ORIGINATING CIRCUMSTANCES of this entire phase, in being TRANSLATED INTO THE HUMAN PHYSICAL BODY would then appear as type 1 Diabetes BUT, would then seemingly SPONTANEOUSLY DISAPPEAR at the point the subtle body effects of the original circumstances were dealt with!!!

Let me point out something ELSE that is not only ‘OBSERVABLE’ but is also HIGHLY ANOMALOUS about modern medicine’s diagnostic approaches!!!!

Academics as medical doctors working within ‘medical’ fields have nurses take blood samples AS THE PRIMARY MEANS OF INVESTIGATING ‘ANYTHING’!!! So, this essentially means that ALL unhealthy conditions are PRIMARILY investigated because of OBVIOUS physical body symptoms, hence blood samples are taken to check for internal physical body ‘abnormalities’!!!


To make you aware of your ‘full’ health problems circumstances then you should also be aware that it is a FACT, that EVERY SINGLE ONE OF US HERE, including ‘YOU’ READING THIS NOW, are always being re-incarnated (yet again) into a ‘new’ physical life/human body/fetus/baby. Which essentially ALSO means that the origins of many, MANY health issues, JUST IN A BASIC PHYSICAL LIFE SENSE, are actually HIGHLY LIKELY TO ORIGINATE FROM WITHIN PREVIOUS INCARNATIONS/PAST LIVES!!!

In other words, some and possibly ‘MANY’ health issues actually originate within a PAST LIFE/LIVES.


To begin to appreciate/understand this, then just think of the accumulation ‘POTENTIAL’ of yourself having lived many past lives being subjected to circumstances of betrayal as well as serious let downs and disappointments . . . what do you think will be the progressive accumulated outcome of these in each future life?

In this respect, to state that academics, scientists, health ‘professionals’ as well as medical doctors investigations/appraisals of health issue origins/CAUSES are just ONE ‘DIMENSIONAL’ is likely to be a MASSIVE/GROSS:


Just in case you’re a bit sceptical and or stupidly oblivious of the current ‘STATE OF MEDICINE’ then here are some ‘quotes’ from medical science publishers that sum up science in general and modern medicine/medical research in particular!!!

ONE: Richard Horton, editor-in-chief, The Lancet, in The Lancet, 11 April, 2015, Vol 385, “Offline: What is medicine’s 5 sigma?”:

“The case against science is straightforward: much of the scientific literature, perhaps half, may simply be untrue. Afflicted by studies with small sample sizes, tiny effects, invalid exploratory analyses, and flagrant conflicts of interest, together with an obsession for pursuing fashionable trends of dubious importance, science has taken a turn towards darkness”

“The apparent endemicity of bad research behaviour is alarming. In their quest for telling a compelling story, scientists too often sculpt data to fit their preferred theory of the world. Or they retrofit hypotheses to fit their data. Journal editors deserve their fair share of criticism too. We aid and abet the worst behaviours. Our acquiescence to the impact factor fuels an unhealthy competition to win a place in a select few journals. Our love of ‘significance’ pollutes the literature with many a statistical fairy-tale…Journals are not the only miscreants. Universities are in a perpetual struggle for money and talent…”

TWO: Marcia Angell, former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, in the NY Review of Books, January 15, 2009, “Drug Companies & Doctors: A Story of Corruption”:

“It is simply no longer possible to believe much of the clinical research that is published, or to rely on the judgment of trusted physicians or authoritative medical guidelines. I take no pleasure in this conclusion, which I reached slowly and reluctantly over my two decades as an editor of The New England Journal of Medicine.”

THREE: John PA Ioannidis, Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Ioannina School of Medicine, Ioannina, Greece, and Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Department of Medicine, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, in PLoS Medicine, August 30, 2005, “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False”:

“There is increasing concern that most current published research findings [in all scientific fields] are false… a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller…when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias…There is increasing concern that in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even the vast majority of published research claims. However, this should not be surprising. It can be proven that most claimed research findings are false.”

FOUR: Back to Richard Horton, editor-in-chief of The Lancet. In the same editorial quoted above, Horton makes reference to a recent symposium he attended at the Wellcome Trust in London. The subject of the meeting was the reliability of published biomedical research. His following quote carries additional force because he and other attendees were told to obey Chatham House rules, meaning no one would reveal who made any given comment during the conference.

“A lot of what is published is incorrect.’ I’m not allowed to say who made this remark [at the conference] because we were asked to observe Chatham House rules. We were also asked not to take photographs of slides. Those who worked for government agencies pleaded that their comments especially remain unquoted, since the forthcoming UK election meant they were living in ‘purdah’ a chilling state where severe restrictions on freedom of speech are placed on anyone on the government’s payroll. Why the paranoid concern for secrecy and non-attribution? Because this symposium, on the reproducibility and reliability of biomedical research, held at the Wellcome Trust in London last week touched on one of the most sensitive issues in science today: the idea that something has gone fundamentally wrong with one of our greatest human creations [biomedical science]”.

The above were found and collated by John Rappoport!!!

There there is this (from here):

“More than 70% of researchers have tried and failed to reproduce another scientist’s experiments, and more than half have failed to reproduce their own experiments. Those are some of the telling figures that emerged from Nature’s survey of 1,576 researchers who took a brief online questionnaire on reproducibility in research.”

If half (as in 50%) couldn’t reproduce their own work, then this means that even those that did the first study and whom therefore at least have the greatest potential to have exacting details of ‘WHAT THEY DID THE FIRST TIME’, still ‘somehow’ get different outcomes 50% of the time specifically when repeating their own work, then doesn’t this at least ‘suggest’ some degree of incompetence?

Conversely, as part of my consistent DAY IN DAY OUT/MOMENT BY MOMENT ORIENTATION TO ‘MYSELF’, which, (as I already mentioned) was part of my stupendously RATIONAL program to ‘understand’ myself, as well as to help facilitate myself to identify/become aware of the sources/origins/past circumstances responsible for and or contributing to my own negative issues/current life ‘NOW’ debilitations, I SUDDENLY/SPONTANEOUSLY got access to a past life/previous incarnation. This happened during a phase where I’d been in seriously disturbing ‘shit’ feelings/emotions/trauma of anguish and despair (as I describe on this page here) that had been building up, getting worse and worse for over a year while coincidentally these feelings didn’t relate IN THE SLIGHTEST (being an EXPERT IN BOTH ‘OBSERVATION’ & ‘MYSELF’) to absolutely ANYTHING OF MY CURRENT LIFE.


Let me re-frame the above with respect to the MASSIVE EFFORT that was made to prevent me/myself (someone whom has been dedicated in ‘ORIENTATING TO & ACCESSING’ THEMSELVES for about a decade and a half (at this point)) from actually becoming aware of the ‘ORIGINS’ of what was ‘RESPONSIBLE’ for some extremely wearing/disturbing emotions/feelings that I’d experienced for maybe a year or longer, feelings which absolutely didn’t make any sense to myself with respect to my current life!!!

In gaining access to my past lives/past ‘incarnations’ I then started to check for potential PAST LIFE INFLUENCES/ORIGINS for every ‘odd’ feeling/sensation/out of context/odd experiences/responses I had from this point on. This had me accessing, ENGAGING WITH and resolving literally 1000’s of events within previous lifetimes, during which I’d been negatively impacted/disturbed/traumatized by all sorts of circumstances such that THESE WERE STILL INFLUENCING/IMPACTING ME IN MY CURRENT LIFE!!!

After about six EXTREMELY INTENSE months, during which I was doing this ALL THE TIME, EVERY DAY, this coincided with me leaving the university and becoming self employed as a healer/practitioner/therapist.

In that on previous/other pages/series here I’ve made a good case that pretty much all of the ‘newage’ people are simulating someone involved in designing what we are living in now and or are ‘following’ the simulation project, then you can ‘glean’ clues/deduce many possibilities with respect to many facets of the simulation project (at least from certain angles) by taking notice of what the new age lot present.

In this respect, if there ‘IS’ some sleight of hand as to the REAL CAUSES of diseases/health issues then the new age crowd will likely have alternate and ‘WORSE’, NONE PHYSICAL views as to the ORIGINS of specific health issues.

Worryingly for academics and scientists THIS ‘IS’ THE CASE, there are at least three books:

Louise L Hay: “Heal Your Body”, then another by Dr, Daniel R. Condron: “Permanent Healing” and another by Kurt Tepperwein: “What the disease means” Although I also found a web site here with a page called: Analyzing the Metaphysical Causes of Disease.

From the first book: “Diabetes: Longing for what might have been, a great need for control, deep sorrow, no ‘sweetness’ left.”

From the 2nd book: “Diabetes: Refusing to give, takes the form of deliberately withholding the self from others, fear of never being able to have enough. Thinking self does not have enough to give, therefore being stingy with how one gives.”

The 3rd book presents pretty accurate descriptions of the simulation software’s PISS TAKING symbolic conversions that result in DIABETES symptoms appearing within the physical body: “Inability to love without compensating, disappointment, feeling unworthy. Invitation to love yourself more, to enjoy life. Sugar has always been a symbol of love and affection. Through the glucosaminas, the grandparents show their affection to their grandchildren and with sweets the obese console themselves of their problems and their solitude. For this reason, sugar is often synonymous with “pleasant sensations, love and or affection”. The diabetic demonstrates with his physical reaction that he can receive affection and love (in the material form of sugar), but that he can not assimilate them. He is unable to digest the affection that surrounds him. Diabetes indicates that we do not accept the “sweet” sides of life, pleasure, love, because we believe we do not deserve affection. We lack the ability to love (often due to a deception not assimilated (i.e. betrayal?)) And now we dare not admit our desires, we are living a mental substitute . . . “

Strangely, if you’ve been subjected to ‘BETRAYAL, SERIOUS LET DOWNS, SERIOUS DISAPPOINTMENTS’ and particularly with respect to your RELATIONSHIPS WITH OTHERS then the above ’causes’ as ‘symptoms’ are what you’d expect of people being subjected to these circumstances. Just think of what African Americans as slaves as well as Native American tribal peoples HAVE been subjected to likely throughout many past life incarnations too!!!

THE ‘IMPORTANT’ SUMMARY/CONCLUSION BIT: I’m presenting this ‘extra’ information on this page ‘NOW’ because despite that I ‘KNOW’ the actual real causes of diabetes, . . . our fake reality is determinedly PREVENTING MYSELF (& LIKELY ALL OTHER ‘COMPETENT’ SUBTLE BODY AWARE HEALERS) FROM ACCESSING AND ‘HENCE’ RESOLVING THE SUBTLE BODY ORIGINATED CAUSES OF THESE . . . this is why I stopped working with people directly and re-orientated to directly confront the inner SHITTY ‘workings’ of our fake reality . . . beyond this, it is a readily observable fact, that our fake reality is also completely focused on increasing the number and or ‘severity’ of health issues . . . while also preventing the real ‘origins’ of health issues from being properly understood never mind actually properly dealt with, as in ‘healed’ and it’s also quite creative as well as effective in it’s sabotaging of ALL medical research efforts including supporting bizarre/completely useless/wrong dietary advice, as well as ensuring that the likes of Vitamin&Mineral products have been and continue to be, of not only useless V&M forms BUT despite that some actual ‘rare/valid’ research has actually shown these to be detrimental to health i.e. even products that one imagines ‘should’ be helping to improve health are in the majority of cases doing the opposite, even worse ‘STILL’ NOTHING IS DONE ABOUT THIS/VIRTUALLY NO ONE EVEN NOTICES . . . IN EFFECT, every single angle you can think of has been stacked against us . . .

. . . hence the utterly depressing world health ‘stats’ that I give below for a wide range of specific health issues . . .

Which brings me to presenting some of the many, MANY ‘INCONVENIENT’ ‘HEATH’ FACTS/TRUTHS . . .

Did you know that over 95% of the world’s population has a health problem (19 people out of 20), while over a third (7 out of 20) have more than FIVE health issues? I quote:

“Just one in 20 people worldwide (4·3%) had no health problems in 2013, with a third of the world’s population (2·3 billion individuals) experiencing more than five ailments, according to a major new analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study (GBD) 2013, published in The Lancet.”

In other words on modern medicines/modern medical doctors’ ‘WATCH’ pretty much our entire population is ILL/UNWELL/SICK because they’ve been getting progressively SICKER at an alarming rate and particularly when compared to ‘OTHER’ COMMON LIFE/LIVING INDICATORS’!!! ‘IF’ this is ‘correct’ then you’d expect a disproportionate increase in heath care costs compared to things like WAGES/INCOME being visibly OBSERVABLE.

Such as the following graph, which indicates that health care costs have increased way faster in proportion to pretty much EVERYTHING ELSE!!!! In other words, you’re not only BEING MADE TO BE ILL & MORE & MORE ILL OVER TIME . . . . BUT YOU ARE ALSO BEING MADE TO PAY MORE & MORE & MORE FOR BEING ‘MADE’ TO BE MORE ILL TOO . . .Within the UK, European and or USA populations (MASSIVE medical research / health costs expenditure) then what % of these populations have a specific health condition?

  1. Diabetes 7% (all types) (in 2015) was about 2.5% in 1990 and about 1% in 1965 (incidence is worse among multiple-race, black, and American Indian or Alaska Native)
  2. Heart Disease in age/% terms: 20-39 11% / 40-59 38% / 60-79 68% / 80+ 85%. In terms of deaths, 32% of deaths in USA attributed to Heart disease (for STARK massive changes in incidence of deaths since the 1900’s see third graph down here).
  3. Anorexia / Eating Disorders (bulimia nervosa, Binge Eating) 4% (at any one time) BUT 20-25% of people at some point within their life develop/have some eating disorder
  4. Asthma 8% (worse among multiple-race, black, and American Indian or Alaska Native)
  5. Eczema 10% (Children) 5.5% (Adults or ‘everyone’ I’m not sure)
  6. Back Pain / Chronic Pain (upright human) approximately 60% to 80% will get at least mild back pain at some time in our lives (55% of all adults, experienced ‘pain’ (not necessarily back pain) in the previous three months), 11% report having back pain at any one time. 12.5% up to 25% U.S. adults have some ‘chronic’ pain condition at any particular time.
  7. Arthritis 22% (or similar: rheumatism, gout, lupus, or fibromyalgia)
  8. Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) 7.8% in 2003 to 9.5% in 2007 and to 11.0% in 2011-12 for children aged 4-17 years of age.
  9. Insomnia/Lack of Sleep 30% impacted, with 55% of these reporting having relationship difficulties, 77% report issues of concentration, 64% are less productive at work, 83% have problems with their mood and 93% with energy levels (lack of sleep is linked to cancer, diabetes, heart disease, stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, obesity and poor mental health among other health problems and impacts between 40% and 60% of people over the age of 60). Did you know that after just one night of only four or five hours’ sleep, your natural cancer killing cells (that appear in your body every day) drop by 70 per cent or that the World Health Organization has classed any form of night-time shift work as a probable carcinogen?
  10. Restless Legs Syndrome: up to 10% (Restless legs syndrome may affect up to 10% of the U.S. population. It affects both sexes, but is more common in women and may begin at any age, even in young children. Most people who are affected severely are middle-aged or older.)
  11. Depression 13.9% in women and 8.5% in men in Europe, 9.1% for American adults

When Doctors Go On Strike Patients Stop Dying (this is here)

Johns Hopkins study suggests medical errors are third-leading cause of death in U.S. (this is here)

Here are some more ‘inconvenient’ possibilities . . .

In that I have ALREADY made a STRONG case that we are simulating MANY people here that were originally interfaced to different hermaphrodite animal forms (on this page here) and in that this means/implies that many people here may be simulating someone that was NOT interfaced to a human, then the following questions are likely extremely relevant/pertinent with respect to some very specific health issues:

  1. What food did these NONE HUMANS eat?
  2. What was the ‘natural’ environment of these none human forms?

In this respect, can you think of any potential problems that may arise/could be ‘EXPECTED’ if you are putting all incarnated people in your simulation into a SINGLE one size fits all species when ORIGINALLY they were of incarnated into very different species with perhaps very different food and or environment requirements/expectations?

The implications for diet never mind allergic reactions are enormous!!!

Allergies/Allergic Reactions:

  1. General Allergy: Worldwide, the rise in prevalence of allergic diseases has continued in the industrialized world for more than 50 years sensitization rates to one or more common allergens among school children are currently approaching 40%-50%. In 2012, 10.6% or 7.8 million children reported respiratory allergies in the past 12 months.
  2. Hay Fever: Roughly 7.8% of people 18 and over in the U.S. have hay fever.
  3. Sinusitis: Roughly 13% of people 18 and over in the U.S. have sinusitis.
  4. Drug Allergy: Worldwide, adverse drug reactions may affect up to 10% of the world’s population and affect up to 20% of all hospitalized patients.
  5. Food Allergy: Children: 8% have a food allergy.
  6. Skin Allergy: Worldwide, urticaria occurs with lifetime prevalence above 20% // In 2010, black children in the U.S. were more likely to have had skin allergies (17%) than white (12%) or Asian (10%) children.

Basically on medical science’s and particularly academics/scientists ‘medical’ researchers’ ‘WATCH’, pretty much EVERY HEALTH CONDITION YOU CAN THINK OF IS AT AN ALL TIME HIGH/GETTING STEADILY WORSE!!!

EARLY MAY ADDITION TO THIS PAGE: (sent to me by a site reader)


In November 2017 the American Heart Association changed the guidelines for the definition of ‘high blood pressure’ from above 140/90 to 130/80 with the outcome that almost half the population in the US now have ‘high blood pressure’ (14%/10s of millions more than there we’re before this change, apparently directly impacting more younger people).

Apparently many doctors we’re taken aback by these new guidelines, and some of the more critical ones stated (the obvious), that it is for (the pharmaceutical companies) to sell more drugs!!!

Coincidentally, pretty much all high blood pressure drugs have numerous and also ‘bad’ side effects, such that usually people will have to try out a variety of different blood pressure drugs (i.e. they sell even more), in order to find the product or combinations of products that result in the LEAST ‘SHIT’ SIDE EFFECTS, or at the very least the least SHIT SIDE EFFECTS THEY CAN LIVE WITH (this was stated by a very knowledgeable pharmacy sales woman when I was getting mine).

Also, while reading the side effect lists on the two different products I got, they made for ‘REALLY SCARY’ READING (perhaps possibly even scary enough to put peoples blood pressure up even more!!!! – haha). I also got some of the stated side effects pretty much instantly when feeling forced to take the first pills (which a close friend told me was of the same ‘family of drugs’ as she got, and which were the drugs which set off the ultra extreme allergic reactions she ‘NOW’ suffers from (coincidentally requiring yet more medication)). The same friend got her bp level lowered and under control through things like juice fasting and taking natural products etc (same as I’m trying to do).

Also, everyone with high blood pressure is cajoled and persuaded to by a blood pressure ‘monitor’ I paid about £30 for mine, on UK amazon, (some we’re come cheaper) although in Denmark (for example), they’re often £40-60, and especially if they are from one of the ‘trustworthy’ brands.

Below is a table of ‘official’ statistics for the USA population the ‘violet’ shaded area is specifically of % of high blood pressure which is telling us that the age adjusted figure applies to about 60% of the adult population which would be about 60% of about 300million people which would be 180 million people each being recommended/cajoled into buying a blood pressure monitor which at 180 million x say £40 comes to £72 billion pounds . . . or $93 billion dollars or 83 billion euros . . . and in that you’ve always new models coming out and that things are designed to break if you even look at them in a funny way then they’ll probably be replaced every 2 or 3 or 4 years . . .

THE BOTTOM LINE IS THIS: ‘IF’ what they are doing was in any way ‘correct’ then shouldn’t we have been seeing the reverse happening over the last few decades!!! NEVER MIND, that ‘IF’ they actually are EXPERTS IN “OBSERVATION & OR ‘RATIONAL’ EVALUATIONS” . . . then don’t you think it would be them/many of them writing this AND NOT MYSELF!!!!

Read the green linked page presented below for details of a human body & ‘evolution’ supporting diet that if used will help you to at least ‘limit/reduce/slow down and or maybe even stop’ the slide towards accumulating more and more health issues (which so far has been the case for myself) . . .

Share this page: