October 8, 2014
"Earth as a Simulation Series I: How the New Age movements spiritual sayings are 'correct' for a COPIED population where everyone is 'accurately' living SOMEONE ELSE's LIFE. How 'Confirmation Bias & Cognitive Dissonance' are the deducible 'Fixed Behavior's' a copied population will present BUT, wont figure out because 'software' defined people can easily be managed."
Now, because I’m a ‘proper’ researcher and I seriously think about all sorts of things AND particularly so because I want to understand ‘reality’ AND ‘what is going on here’ in a deeper sense then a lot of the new age sayings actually seriously annoyed me because firstly even though they often ‘felt right’ they ‘cognitively’ just didn’t make sense in the slightest whilst secondly, the apparent ‘strategic’ use of these ‘sayings’ would often, very effectively directly negate the engagement of any deeper discussion of even THINKING, in fact ‘deeper’ thinking about new age, spiritual and subtle realms AND these particular ‘sayings’ or ‘beliefs’ specifically just doesn’t happen and thirdly as I’ve already mentioned there is the attitude that if you ‘DON’T GET THEM’ then you are ‘simply’ not spiritually developed enough to understand them at this point in time.
“You should be suspicious that these popular new age sayings appear to not be ‘seriously’ discussed and questioned (or discussed AT ALL) by the new age crowd. You should be suspicious that they are bizarrely automatically ‘accepted’ as being ‘true’ and ‘self evident’. You should also be suspicious that they seem not to be noticed by people outside of the new age movement (including those that would call themselves researchers).”
You could say that most ‘new age, lightworkers’ types accept these sayings at face value because these sayings ‘feel right’.
Even more bizarre, I also often found myself feeling that these sayings ‘felt right’ to myself too while at the same time I would also be aware that I would have no ‘rational’ understanding of what these sayings actually ‘really’ meant.
I was however, personally suspicious about the ‘feeling right’ feelings with respect to these sayings because before I got directly involved in these ‘new age’ areas I’d already spent many years making a serious effort to engage with my feelings in a general sense as well as my inner states and subtle perceptions and in this respect I’d built up a ‘sense’ of the ‘integrity’ of my own feelings during that time and then had some ability to identify feelings that didn’t seem right and to question them and even to actually try and identify what might be ‘corrupting or influencing’ them.
You might notice that these particular sayings are not limited to the vague and disputed ‘spiritual or subtle’ realms, they all relate to reality AS A WHOLE.
In other words these ‘sayings’ conveniently include the easily observed ‘visible’ bits and thus offer those with a ‘physical’ fixation the opportunity to apply analytical THINKING and rational REASONING as a means to explore and evaluate likely possibilities . . .
Now, it shouldn’t take much analytical THINKING and rational REASONING about the above list of sayings for it to be very, VERY obvious that NONE of these sayings CAN BE ‘TRUE’ or even vaguely CORRECT ‘IF’ we are in an assumed REAL reality. A reality that was ‘apparently’ initiated by a so called big bang and which has been unfolding according to so called ‘natural’ laws never mind that the abundance of organic life forms here are all supposedly subject to natural selection and so called ‘evolution’ which has resulted in ourselves developing and evolving to where we are today.
Unfortunately, as far as I can tell this imagined amazing process of evolution has the majority of people exhibiting severe symptoms of mental and cognitive retardation and particularly so with respect to those that imagine themselves to be rational.
Rational people would actually THINK and PONDER first and them put forward ‘possibilities’ rather than of what is more commonly observed which is to bizarrely exhibit an immediate ‘that’s complete bullshit’ OR ‘this is ‘irrational’ superstitious nonsense’ response (while often not even being suspicious about this entirely ‘irrational’ response either . . . ).
So, what would be a very rational and very objective response to the above list of ‘bizarre’ so called ‘spiritual’ sayings that are considered true by some?
Well, for anyone that is able to exhibit even a modicum of rational or objective thinking traits whom was confronted by even one of the sayings on the above list then they might ask the following seriously objective never mind cognitively competent question . . .
“Exactly how would the FUNDAMENTAL nature of reality HAVE TO BE for any of these sayings to ACTUALLY be CORRECT?”
If anyone did manage to engage enough neurons to formulate the above then it’s possible that they might ‘rationally’ then spend some time THINKING and pondering about the possibility of there being a specific ‘make up or foundation of reality’ that would ‘bizarrely’ result in these so called ‘spiritual’ sayings each being ENTIRELY & COMPLETELY TRUE?
So, ‘IF’ you reading this have analytically and cognitively evolved enough to ‘THINK’ objectively then what would be the most obvious ‘alternate’ reality possibilities that would be the FIRST that you would begin to ‘rationally’ evaluate ‘IF’ you wanted to be objective about investigating these ‘weird’ sayings possibilities, you know, ‘PROPERLY’ (as in ‘rationally and objectively’)?
What would be the two seriously ‘obvious’ alternate reality possibilities that would be the first that ANY rational person ‘should’ easily spontaneously think of and which would be the first for them to ‘evaluate’ and consider as possibilities to see if any of these sayings would ‘magically’ turn out to be correct ‘IF’ we were in either of the two common and popularly known about alternate realities?
Any ideas?
Click the right >> link below for the next page in this series . .
Filed under 'NEW AGE' Revelations; The New age people are Revealed as Supporters of an Earth Simulation Project, Pages related to Prof Bostroms Simulation Argument